Justice Myra Bielby

If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and describe the services you offer. Also, be sure to showcase a premium service.

Having a big sale, on-site celebrity, or other event? Be sure to announce it so everybody knows and gets excited about it.

Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

The Limitation of Action Act is clear you can not add a new claim or claimant after the 2 year limitation period has expired from the file date of The Original Statement of Claim 

The Statement of Claim was filed on July 8, 1997 and The Personal Representatives were add to the claim on September 18, 2001 and after the pleading were closed by way of Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Order to file The Certificate of Readiness on March 15, 2001. 

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore is in contempt of court if she gets caught. 

Somebody is sent to the Edmonton Law Courts to review the actual court file within Alberta Court of Queen's Bench action no. 9703-12949 and commits fraud on the court by removing the Justice Lewis and Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court orders from the true filed copies.

When Donald Broder and Craig Broder attended The Edmonton Law Courts to review the court file and the clerk of the courts realized these were the two defendants that were framed, she expressed; "please don't blame us we just do what we are told around here." 

Should Clerks of the Court have a confidential whistle blower procedure in lace to protect themselves from being forced to participate in crimes against humanity?

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore explains to Donald Broder lawyer she will be serving Donald Broder for The Application for Probate at The Surrogate Courts by registered mail.

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore is not allowed to represent the Beneficiaries of The Estate of Edmund Broder as she is in litigation within Alberta Court of Queen's Bench action no. 9703-12949 against Donald Broder - Beneficiary for she initiated a court order to close the pleadings on March 15, 2001. 

Robert Sawers has not been retained by Donald Broder for the pending Surrogate Court Application for Probate and as such is not in on record and cannot accept service on Donald Broder's behalf.

Elizabeth Macinnis / Moore must serve Donald Broder directly as per her correspondence either by registered mail or processed server.

Elizabeth MacInnis commits fraud on the courts in spades.

Should Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore be made to return all her legal fees, buy back The Broder Buck and be criminally charged with fraud, conspiracy to defraud and perjury and directing the false imprisonment of an innocent 75 year old senior citizen, Donald Broder?

If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and describe the services you offer. Also, be sure to showcase a premium service.

Having a big sale, on-site celebrity, or other event? Be sure to announce it so everybody knows and gets excited about it.

Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and describe the services you offer. Also, be sure to showcase a premium service.

Having a big sale, on-site celebrity, or other event? Be sure to announce it so everybody knows and gets excited about it.

Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and describe the services you offer. Also, be sure to showcase a premium service.

Having a big sale, on-site celebrity, or other event? Be sure to announce it so everybody knows and gets excited about it.

Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and describe the services you offer. Also, be sure to showcase a premium service.

Having a big sale, on-site celebrity, or other event? Be sure to announce it so everybody knows and gets excited about it.

Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and describe the services you offer. Also, be sure to showcase a premium service.

Having a big sale, on-site celebrity, or other event? Be sure to announce it so everybody knows and gets excited about it.

Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and describe the services you offer. Also, be sure to showcase a premium service.

Having a big sale, on-site celebrity, or other event? Be sure to announce it so everybody knows and gets excited about it.

Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

Justice C. P. Clarke is a member of The Old Boy's Club.

The Certificate of Readiness was to be filed immediately upon the conclusion of Donald Broder and Craig Broder's Appeal before Justice C. P. Clarke.

Justice C. P. Clarke comes to the aide on September 18, 2001, of  Past Chief Justice W. Kenneth Moore's daughter Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore for closing the pleading on herself before she falsified an Affidavit of Service  for the Application for Probate at The Surrogate Courts file to appointed Personal Representatives of Edmund Broder.

The Personal Representatives were appointed by The Surrogate Courts on May 24, 2001, and a false affidavit of service was worn by Joan C. Hill, Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore legal secretary that Donald Broder had been served by registered mail. Donald Broder Canada Post receipt for picking up the registered mail is available and dated May 28, 2001. 

Joan C. Hill base her Affidavit of Service on a note to file.

Should Joan C. Hill be criminally charged with swearing under oath a false Affidavit?

September 18, 2001 Justice C. P. Clarke order The Personal Representatives appointed by The Surrogate Courts on May 24, 2001 can be substitute as Plaintiff's on the Statement of Claim that was filed July 8, 1997 within Alberta Court of Queen's Bench action no. 9703-12949.

Hold on this was Donald Broder and Craig Broder's Appeal of the Master Quinn Order regarding the 129 application as per The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich order.

Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore could not file an Application to add a new Plaintiff to the Statement of Claim as the pleading within the said action were forced closed on March 15, 2001. On September 18, 2001, 4 years had lapsed from The Original Statement of Claim filed date of July 8, 1997 within Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 9703-12949.

Justice C. P. Clarke obviously was made aware that Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore had closed the Pleading on herself within the said action and The Certificate of Readiness must be filed by Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore to close the pleadings within the said action immediately following the conclusion of  Donald Broder and Craig Broder's appeal before him.

Justice C. P. Clarke initiates the  conspiracy to defraud Donald Broder and Craig Broder of The Broder Buck, substantial legal costs and eventually the false incarceration of an innocent 75 year old senior citizen, garnishees and eventually manslaughter. 

Should Justice C. P. Clarke be criminally charged with conspiracy to defraud, obstruction of justice and manslaughter, removed from the bench and tried by a jury?

Heard at Edmonton Law Courts by Justice Cote', Berger and Whittmann - dated 2001-0709.

The Buck For Justice will change the course of history here in Canada.

The Alberta Justice Department is in breach of The Canadian Constitution.

The Justices of the court and lawyers here in Canada collude to frame the innocent.

The Premier Jason Kenny's correspondent has been made aware of the past Alberta Governments failure to protect the innocent and criminally charge these white collar bandits.

Should the Alberta Government follow legislation to investigate The Crown, Justices of the court and all lawyers involved for their roles in falsely incarcerating and defrauding an innocent 75 year old senior citizen Donald Broder, his wife Joyce Broder and his children and grandchildren?

If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and

Argument was; In Rocklake vs. Timberjack can a substitution of a new party be granted by a pleading before a Justice of the court?

[4] By the time the respondent discovered or recalled this, the limitation period had long passed. The respondent moved to cure the misstatement in its statement of claim almost four years after the fire. The notice of motion does not seek any change to the body of the statement of claim, merely "adding or substituting Lee St. John as a plaintiff in this action."

The original Statement of Claim was filed on Julyn8, 1997 and it wasn't until after The Grant of Administration on May 24, 2001 that the party " Personal Representatives" that had standing to sue had been appointed by The Surrogate Courts, and on September 18, 2001 Justice C. P. Clarke substituted The Personal Representatives as Plaintiff's within action 9703-12949 excess of four years from the original Statement of Claim file date of July 8, 1997. 

To substitute a party to a action relies on rules of court then filing an application and providing case law to support what's being requested. Rules of Court are regulations and cannot override Statutes. 

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

[15]      The problem in the present case is not that the Rules of Court lack power to amend parties or pleadings. They have them. No modern decision on amendment suggests that there is any difficulty curing parties before the limitation period expires. The problem is that there was an independent statute, the Limitations of Actions Act, which restricted times to sue.

[18]     The analytical approach adopted in Alberta is simple. One cannot sue after the limitation period. Adding a new plaintiff or a new defendant or a new cause of action to a suit after the period expires, in effect creates a new suit, so far as that the new party or cause of action is concerned. Limitation legislation is intended to give repose after a certain length of time and adding a new plaintiff or new cause of action violates that policy almost as much as adding a new defendant.

Are your customers raving about you on social media? Share their great stories to help turn potential customers into loyal ones.

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

Have you opened a new location, redesigned your shop, or added a new product or service? Don't keep it to yourself, let folks know.

Customers have questions, you have answers. Display the most frequently asked questions, so everybody benefits.

[19]     The Rules of Court do not speak about limitation periods or times to amend. They have always been reconciled with limitation legislation by presuming that the powers under the Rules are to be exercised subject to the time limits under the legislation, when those are relevant. 

cf. Nagy vs. Philips …………….   

Furthermore, the Rules of Court are a Regulation, and were not confirmed by statutes until the 1970s. 

Regulations cannot override statutes.

On September 18, 2001 Justice C. P. Clarke at Edmonton Law Courts was in chambers for Donald Broder and Craig Broder's appeal of Master Quinn's order and although excess of four years had lapsed from the  original Statement of Claim file date of July 8, 1997 to September 18, 2001 Justice C. P. Clarke substitutes The Personal Representatives as Plaintiffs within the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench action no. 9703-12949.

Donald Broder and Craig Broder were present at the application before Justice C. P. Clarke and witnessed biased and prejudiced Un-Justice C. P. Clarke winking at there lawyer Robert Sawers.

The evidence provided proves beyond a reasonable doubt almost every lawyer and Justice of the court that was involved in the Broder vs. Broder litigation are all white collar criminals that conspire to defraud, commit fraud on the courts, obstruction of justice and perjury to orchestrate the outcome and frame the innocent.

All Premiers of all provinces and territories, members of parliament and The Prime Minister Justine Trudeau have been informed and continue to do nothing to stop this criminal activity and restore a fair and legal Justice System here in Alberta and Canada as a whole.

Should all governments of Canada legislate The Law Societies be replaced by a governing body to over see all aspects of The Provincial Justice Systems and stop the self governance of the lawyers governing themselves?

The Buck For Justice website has substantiated the evidence in a clear and concise manner for all the world to read and understand.

The Justice System in all democratic societies were not established by governments to be used to frame, defraud and falsely incarcerate the innocent.

The Governments of Canada will be held accountable should the leaders refuse to criminally charge these identified gangsters and create legislation that created protection for all within the Justice System and has severe consequences for those that breach the Canadian Constitution and Human Rights.

When accusation of wrong doing are brought against The Crown it is legislated that the Crown be notified of the allegations in writing allow six months for The Crown to investigate itself and if the allegations are validated and deemed to be true, then The Crown is to plead guilty to itself and make restitution to the victim or victims.

Is now precedence and as such can be referenced in any court proceeding;

1) Court Orders do not have to be followed until such time as The Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Order within action 9703-12949 has been followed.

2) Backdating the FIAT on The Amended Statement of Defence and forging Judges signatures is acceptable practice within the Canadian Justice Systems until such time as Bryan Kickham of Miller Thompson is criminally charged for his role in committing this crime against Donald Broder.

3) Perjury is acceptable as per Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore telling the trial Judge Justice Bielby that the first time lack of personal representative was raised by Donald Broder was early 2001, when as the facts that were presented was actually raised within the Original Statement of Defence file and served in July 1997.

4) Affidavits of Service sworn by Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore legal secretary Joan C. Hill can be based on a note to file and does not require an form of physical service to a Defendant / Beneficiary for a new action being commenced.

5) Garnishing a 75 year old lady's, Joyce M. Broder's bank account while she's in Good Samaritans Long Term Care facility dying from illness and in stage 4 Alzheimer's is a low as it goes for these white collar criminals.

6) Donald Broder's opening statement were deleted from the trial audio.

7) Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich Court Order went missing from the file at Edmonton Law Courts?

On Friday April 23, 2004, Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore requested Justice Myra Bielby cite  Donald Broder in contempt of court for not following her 2004 court order and incarcerated him until he learns a lesson to follow court orders . Justice Myra Bielby had access to the file at the trial and ought to have known that it was Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore that did not adhere to the February 13, 2001 Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich court order to file The Certificate of Readiness and close the pleading within Alberta Court of Queen's Bench action 9703-12949 on March 15, 2001 well before May 24, 2001 Surrogate Court .  Instead Justice Myra Bielby falsely incarcerated an innocent man from April 23 - May 4, 2004 for not following her 2004 court order to turn over the Broder Buck. 

On Friday April 23, 2004, Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore requested Justice Myra Beilby cite  Donald Broder in contempt of court for not following her 2004 court order and incarcerated him until he learns a lesson to follow court orders . Justice Myra Bielby had access to the file at the trial and ought to have known that it was Elizabeth MacInnis / Moore that did not adhere to the February 13, 2001 Chief Justice A. H. Wachowich court order to file The Certificate of Readiness and close the pleading within Alberta Court of Queen's Bench action 9703-12949 on March 15, 2001 well before May 24, 2001 Surrogate Court .  Instead Justice Myra Bielby falsely incarcerated an innocent man from April 23 - May 4, 2004 for not following her 2004 court order to turn over the Broder Buck.